The dreamers new yorker
There was a time when New York had the final say on everything and it seemed like it would forever. I ate there occasionally when I passed though the world of finance after the turn of this century. A different restaurant occupies it now. I have entered only as far as the bar for a swift martini, for fear that in the course of a full meal the old spell would be broken.
The New York Times. As far as the social elite that Vanderbilt and her family personified I never got much of a look. I moved to Manhattan some years ago as a graduate student with little interest in power or social life. But the grimier city I lived in then is dwindling, too. The dive bars in which I slurped through my twenties and thirties are now gone.
To see the worst, visit Soho: once an industrial-bohemian-Italian-Chinese mishmash, it is now Mall of America East, with the Apple Store as the anchor attraction. It is easy to complain about gentrification. Cruz contributed two short stories to the collection, which she says are part of a larger in-progress memoir. The desire to tell these stories is underlit by a new urgency, she noted, as issues surrounding immigration increasingly rise to the surface of political discourse in the United States.
The program was, in fact, founded in with the mission of countering anti-immigration sentiments. The stories, which vary widely in tone and topic, accomplish this mission by presenting a diverse picture of undocumented life. Indeed, no two stories and no two voices are the same. There was a time not long ago when Rojas, 27, who was brought to the states from Mexico at 2 months old, might have refrained from telling this particular story out of apprehension — but not anymore.
Then, joining PEN America, I remember one of the things [Enrigue] told us was, how about you just finish writing a story, then worry about everything else, and there is power in that. It was important to show the truth and beauty of that messiness, Rojas noted. Rojas participated in the program last year, when she wrote a play.
Kael died a year later, on Labor Day They are not dying, far from it, but they have become creatures that hardly anyone can love. The New Yorker was worth reading if only to catch up with her excoriations. But she hated some movies because she loved others, and there was always the larger question of the movies in general, an art form still in the making.
I loved the speed of it, the fact that you had your say and moved on to something else. Jean-Luc Godard was born in Paris in , and spent his early years in Switzerland. He went to school and started his directing career in Paris, but he lives in Switzerland now, and indeed has strung a whole career along this line of transit: a Swiss who makes French films, a Parisian who works at home in Rolle, a small town on Lake Geneva.
Two of them have scripts under their arm. The date is , and the men are working on Breathless. Godard is in the middle, apparently looking between his companions at the camera. He has a hat and dark glasses. He is standing on one leg. See illustration on page But the worst is never less than intelligent, and the best is the best there is.
We can look at these two possibilities together in Les Carabiniers , for example. The two fellows have a fairly good time pushing civilians around and generally misbehaving, but return with none of the fabulous plunder they had been promised.
They have only a set of dog-eared postcards of famous sights, which they slap onto the table one by one with an extraordinary air of triumph, as if they had discovered vast new worlds, and brought back infinite riches. This is the sequence Kael is thinking about, and it is wonderfully funny—and haunting, because of the strange interplay between the moving camera and the frozen, overfamiliar stillness of the scenes on the postcards.
One of the peasants goes to the movies for the first time, and is completely captivated. He is baffled when a filmed woman leaves the frame, and he edges along his row of seats in the hope of continuing to see her; edges back along the row when she returns into view. Finally the film within the film shows the same person undressing and getting into a bath. Frustrated by the fact that the bath now hides the woman from him, our hero approaches the screen and tries to climb up the side of the bath to peer in.
The screen tears and leaves a huge gap, but the film continues, unharmed, uninterrupted, on the bare wall. Film is perishable, the stock can fade, the reel can break, the projector may jam.
But as long as the film is running it is impervious and immortal, as indifferent to its own content and the material world it occupies as it is to our interests and desires.
Godard gave us back the adventure of finding a world on film, the sense of looking at familiar things as if we had never seen them. And in this adventure the characters and the photography are again paired.
This is why so many of them die so suddenly—not because reality catches up with them, but because their script needs an ending, and hardly anything is better for this purpose than a shootout.
No, only away from realism, understood as an attempt to duplicate a world we think we know. Essentially the perception is a double one. The hero, an assassin for a right-wing French organization at the time of the Algerian war, played by Michel Subor, meets up with a charming and eccentric Danish girl, played by Anna Karina.
He goes to her apartment to photograph her. We see Subor pointing his still camera and clicking, and we see him when he is not shooting, walking around the room like a person in a movie.
We see Karina as she is being photographed, as she will look in the future photo print, and also as she looks now, between clicks, living moments of her life no one will ever see except the still-to-be-found snoopers in the cinema.
0コメント